sellmefear
← all entries

THE SAME WORDS, PRINTED DIFFERENTLYMonday 03 August 2026

2 outlets quote this line 2 different ways.

thefederal.com: “Now that the Supreme Court has removed all confusion, we expect the Government of India and every BJP/NDA-ruled state to honour the assurances made to the youth on July 25 by withdrawing cases against…

As published

5 pages captured at the time, in each outlet's own typography. Open one to read the copy held outside the publisher's control.

Same storyLater: Bangladesh's State Minister for Foreign Affairs Shama Obaed Islam sought clarification froEarlier: Bangladesh's State Minister for Foreign Affairs Shama Obaed Islam sought clarification froEarlier: British police arrested 77 people at a protest outside Westminster Magistrates' Court on T (entry not published)Earlier: The Bankipur Assembly bypoll, held on July 30, 2026, is being counted in multiple rounds. Each entry records what was published on its own date and is not edited afterwards.

What this entry found

  • THE ANSWER, NOT THE QUESTION

    2 of 2 outlets print this response without the question it answered.

    • thefederal.com: response only
    • theprint.in: response only
  • ONLY ONE OUTLET HAD THIS

    thefederal.com carried 3 details no other outlet reported.

    • Das expressed dissatisfaction with reports that the Delhi government may merely close or not pursue certain cases rather than withdraw FIRs
    • Das demanded a written assurance from the government guaranteeing that peaceful protesters would not face future legal action
    • Das argued that merely closing cases without withdrawing FIRs would not provide adequate legal protection to students and would leave them exposed to future legal uncertainty
5independent outlets
What happened, for context

The Supreme Court of India clarified its earlier order regarding FIRs (First Information Reports) filed against students who protested over the NEET paper leak. The clarification specified that the term "criminal antecedents" applies only to persons accused of grave or heinous offences such as murder and rape, not to peaceful protesters or those who participated in political demonstrations. The Cockroach Janata Party (CJP) spokesperson Saurav Das welcomed the ruling and called on state governments and the Centre to immediately withdraw FIRs against student protesters.

4 of 5 articles were readable. Headline only, no body text retrieved, for: ndtv.com. Nothing below is drawn from those outlets beyond their headline.

Who reported it

  • millenniumpost.inUNCLASSIFIED
  • ndtv.comINDEP
  • prameyanews.comUNCLASSIFIED
  • thefederal.comUNCLASSIFIED
  • theprint.inUNCLASSIFIED

References

  • millenniumpost.inCJP hails SC clarification on FIRs against NEET protestersScreenshot as publishedOriginalcaptured 2026-08-05T01:03:56
  • ndtv.com'We Have Stood With Students Since Day 1': CJP After Top Court Clarification On FIRsScreenshot as publishedOriginalcaptured 2026-08-05T01:03:56
  • prameyanews.comMajor victory for students, youth: CJP's Saurav Das welcomes SC clarification on FIRs against protestersScreenshot as publishedOriginalcaptured 2026-08-05T01:03:56
  • thefederal.comCJP seeks withdrawal of FIRs against protesters after SC's clarificationScreenshot as publishedOriginalcaptured 2026-08-05T01:03:56
  • theprint.inCJP welcomes SC clarification on FIRs against NEET protesters, seeks immediate implementation of assurancesScreenshot as publishedOriginalcaptured 2026-08-05T01:03:56

Carried by multiple outlets

  • The Supreme Court issued a clarification regarding FIRs against student protesters involved in NEET paper leak demonstrationsmillenniumpost.in, prameyanews.com, thefederal.com, theprint.in
  • The clarification addressed the meaning of the term 'criminal antecedents' from an earlier Supreme Court ordermillenniumpost.in, prameyanews.com, thefederal.com, theprint.in
  • The Supreme Court clarified that 'criminal antecedents' applies only to persons accused of grave or heinous offences such as murder and rapemillenniumpost.in, prameyanews.com, thefederal.com, theprint.in
  • The clarification specified that 'criminal antecedents' does not apply to students who participated in peaceful protests or political demonstrationsmillenniumpost.in, prameyanews.com, thefederal.com, theprint.in
  • States are free to withdraw FIRs, close cases, or file closure reports against student protesters in accordance with lawmillenniumpost.in, prameyanews.com, thefederal.com, theprint.in
  • The Cockroach Janata Party (CJP) welcomed the Supreme Court's clarificationmillenniumpost.in, prameyanews.com, thefederal.com, theprint.in
  • and 3 more, not shown

Reported by one outlet only

  • The Supreme Court indicated it could invoke its powers under Article 142 of the Constitution to ensure 'complete justice' by quashing FIRs registered in different statesonly prameyanews.com
  • Das expressed dissatisfaction with reports that the Delhi government may merely close or not pursue certain cases rather than withdraw FIRsonly thefederal.com
  • Das demanded a written assurance from the government guaranteeing that peaceful protesters would not face future legal actiononly thefederal.com
  • Das argued that merely closing cases without withdrawing FIRs would not provide adequate legal protection to students and would leave them exposed to future legal uncertaintyonly thefederal.com
  • The Centre told the court it was committed to not pursuing cases against students who participated in NEET paper leak protests, provided they did not have criminal antecedentsonly theprint.in
  • The matter is scheduled to be heard again on August 18only theprint.in