sellmefear
← all entries

THE SAME WORDS, PRINTED DIFFERENTLYWednesday 23 September 2026

2 outlets quote this line 2 different ways.

insidehighered.com: “Two years ago, I vetoed a nearly identical bill and, unfortunately, my concerns about its unintended consequences have only grown,”; latimes.com: “Unfortunately, my concerns about its unintended…

As published

5 pages captured at the time, in each outlet's own typography. Open one to read the copy held outside the publisher's control.

Same storyEarlier: Gov. Gavin Newsom vetoed Assembly Bill 713 on September 22, 2026 (Sunday), blocking…Each entry records what was published on its own date and is not edited afterwards.

What this entry found

  • THE SAME WORDS, PRINTED DIFFERENTLY

    2 outlets quote this line 2 different ways.

    • insidehighered.com: “Given the gravity of this bill’s consequences—including potential criminal and civil liability for state employees—the federal courts must resolve the legality of the novel legal theory behind this legislation before we proceed,”
    • latimes.com: “potential criminal and civil liability for state employees”
  • OUTLETS DISAGREE

    The timing of the previous veto: whether it occurred two or three years before the September 2026 veto

    • latimes.com (says 'two years')
    • calonews.com (says 'last three years')
    • kalw.org (says 'two years ago')
    • insidehighered.com (says 'Two years ago')
    the full text
  • ONLY ONE OUTLET HAD THIS

    latimes.com carried 3 details no other outlet reported.

    • The previous similar bill was vetoed two years ago (as of 2026, this would be 2024)
    • UC and CSU remained neutral on the bill
    • UC regents reversed their support for the policy before Newsom's 2024 veto
5independent outlets
What happened, for context

California Gov. Gavin Newsom vetoed Assembly Bill 713 on Sunday, blocking a proposal that would have allowed undocumented college students to work on campuses at UC, CSU, and community college systems. This is the second veto of similar legislation in two to three years. Newsom cited concerns about potential federal government retaliation and legal liability for state employees.

Who reported it

  • calmatters.orgUNCLASSIFIED
  • calonews.comUNCLASSIFIED
  • insidehighered.comUNCLASSIFIED
  • kalw.orgINDEP
  • latimes.comINDEP

References

Carried by multiple outlets

  • Gov. Gavin Newsom vetoed Assembly Bill 713calmatters.org, calonews.com, insidehighered.com, kalw.org, latimes.com
  • The bill would have allowed undocumented students to work on California public college campusescalmatters.org, calonews.com, insidehighered.com, kalw.org, latimes.com
  • This is the second time Newsom has vetoed such a billcalmatters.org, calonews.com, insidehighered.com, kalw.org, latimes.com
  • The bill was based on a legal theory that the 1986 federal law (Immigration Reform and Control Act or IRCA) barring employers from hiring workers without authorization does not apply to state governmentscalmatters.org, calonews.com, insidehighered.com, latimes.com
  • Newsom cited concerns about potential criminal and civil liability for state employees as a reason for the vetocalmatters.org, insidehighered.com, latimes.com
  • Newsom expressed concern about federal government retaliation or federal repercussionscalmatters.org, insidehighered.com, kalw.org, latimes.com
  • and 1 more, not shown

Reported by one outlet only

  • The previous similar bill was vetoed two years ago (as of 2026, this would be 2024)only latimes.com
  • The campaign Opportunity for All was launched in October 2022 by students and professors at UCLAonly calonews.com
  • The campaign was originally intended to be implemented at UC campuses and eventually statewideonly calonews.com
  • Immigrant Justice in Action (IJAC), a coalition of undocumented students in California, criticized Newsom's veto in a statementonly calonews.com
  • UC, CSU, and community college systems enroll an estimated 60,000 students without legal statusonly kalw.org
  • Undocumented students can get state-backed financial aid but are ineligible for most federal grants and loansonly kalw.org

Reported unevenly

  • The timing of the previous veto: whether it occurred two or three years before the September 2026 vetostated by latimes.com (says 'two years'), calonews.com (says 'last three years'), kalw.org (says 'two years ago'), insidehighered.com (says 'Two years ago') · absent from calmatters.org (describes it as 'a four-year battle' and 'second time he vetoed such a bill in three years' in the opening summary)

Not yet confirmed against a primary source

  • Timeline of previous veto: insidehighered.com and kalw.org state Newsom vetoed a similar bill 'two years ago' (2024 if published in 2026), while calonews.com states 'in the last three years' and calmatters.org describes 'a four-year battle' and 'second time he vetoed such a bill in three years.' Clarify which previous veto is being referenced and when it occurred.

What was checked, and against what

Nothing here could be settled from a primary source. 1 cannot be established from public sources and is listed below. Every document is linked so you can read the same record we did. Anything not confirmed is listed as such rather than left out.

  • cannot be established Timeline of previous veto: insidehighered.com and kalw.org state Newsom vetoed a similar bill 'two years ago' (2024 if published in 2026), while calonews.com states 'in the last three years' and calmatters.org describes 'a four-year battle' and 'second time he vetoed such a bill in three years.' Clarify which previous veto is being referenced and when it occurred.The disagreement between outlets is itself the finding. No primary source is needed to report that they differ.